Very good vote, though shame that this website doesnt work properly to see when the new update is.
A New Beginning - Our 1992 Russian Federation
- Thread starter panpiotr
- Start date
-
- Tags
- russia russian federation
Central European point of view together with Blakans (i want some positive comments there and i want to see effects of our involvement of Yugoslavia /Bulgaria).
1. Following the Rose revolution and the escape of President Shevardnadze, the new pro-American government announced withdrawal from all Russian-led factions, including CSTO. Nevertheless, President Shevardnadze request Russia and CSTO to begin a military intervention with a goal of restoring the former government. Please write down, how should the Russian government handle the Georgia crisis?
I'll give my support to the plan of @Matador de Lagartos.
2. Following the American invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003, the old geopolitical order in the Middle East is gone. Please formulate a new Russian strategy for the Middle East taking into account latest developments in the region.
I'll give my support to @ruffino's plan with the addition of @Kriss.
I'll give my support to the plan of @Matador de Lagartos.
2. Following the American invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003, the old geopolitical order in the Middle East is gone. Please formulate a new Russian strategy for the Middle East taking into account latest developments in the region.
I'll give my support to @ruffino's plan with the addition of @Kriss.
1 I support Kriss plan, this revolution is not good as we want to be status quo but think anything soft is just a waste at this point. Sure the people who overthrew him might view him as a more a puppet but they can be put in prison or flee into exile when he returns with CSTO tanks, the Georgian governments softness and people behind this uprising are to blame for the bloodshed.
Way I see it letting the revolution happens means Georgia's security forces will be purged of anything approaching Pro Russia and gain international legitimacy and likely will push for abkhazia sooner or later with more US support. If we attack now while Georgia still unbalanced and internally divided we can salvage something. I think it's fair to be concerned for how it would look internationally and probably will hurt Russia a tad, same time though a sphere of influence relies on the idea of protection not being willing fight means it will disappear the second someone serious wants it.
Now for 2 Support a mix of @Kriss and @ruffino's plan
I will be honest gentleman I think theirs's a limit to what we can do and retain our current pro status quo state who largely focuses on itself and what it regards as it's neighbours, as you know I generally suggest more aggressive/confrontational suggestions for Russia to do. The suggested partners like Syria, Libya and Iran we have to be very wary of feeding them as this Georgian crises could look like a picnic compared this.
We have a bit of a paradox to navigate, we clearly want to begin countering the US moves in the Middle East however to do we must be at least willing to entertain the dreams of those nations we seek to partner with and get them to take risks to do but at same time those dreams will result in such bloodshed and instability a new cold war is guaranteed if they got anywhere close to material. Way I see it we must drip-feed them and hope the US buys for a moderate course that's unstable to keep the US in the forever war.
For Syria as a example it's a great thing the war on terror is such a malleable concept otherwise it would have been been invaded nearly day 1. By the late 90s it's estimated over 15,000 Syrians died fighting against Türkiye for the PKK alone, something which maybe a lot more this timeline, decades of a cruel, corrupt dictatorships and a perception of being at constant war since 1948 alongside state emergencies have radicalised the population while simultaneously shutting down any form of non political expression that's not pro state or radicals who have a captive, despairing audience that the state sometimes uses.
See Abu al-Qaqa a famous Syrian cleric who celebrated the 9/11 attacks a few days after publicly and was arrested for a few hours before the Mukhabarat let him out, and later on went door to door in Aleppo recruiting boys for the Jihad in Iraq.
Currently Syria is feuding with Türkiye over water resources, Israel for a host of reasons, Iraq, various Lebanese parties ect and seeks to become the head of the Arab world, getting more entangled and giving them support we must at least accept the risk some of it's going to be used for something we don't want.
Way I see it letting the revolution happens means Georgia's security forces will be purged of anything approaching Pro Russia and gain international legitimacy and likely will push for abkhazia sooner or later with more US support. If we attack now while Georgia still unbalanced and internally divided we can salvage something. I think it's fair to be concerned for how it would look internationally and probably will hurt Russia a tad, same time though a sphere of influence relies on the idea of protection not being willing fight means it will disappear the second someone serious wants it.
Now for 2 Support a mix of @Kriss and @ruffino's plan
I will be honest gentleman I think theirs's a limit to what we can do and retain our current pro status quo state who largely focuses on itself and what it regards as it's neighbours, as you know I generally suggest more aggressive/confrontational suggestions for Russia to do. The suggested partners like Syria, Libya and Iran we have to be very wary of feeding them as this Georgian crises could look like a picnic compared this.
We have a bit of a paradox to navigate, we clearly want to begin countering the US moves in the Middle East however to do we must be at least willing to entertain the dreams of those nations we seek to partner with and get them to take risks to do but at same time those dreams will result in such bloodshed and instability a new cold war is guaranteed if they got anywhere close to material. Way I see it we must drip-feed them and hope the US buys for a moderate course that's unstable to keep the US in the forever war.
For Syria as a example it's a great thing the war on terror is such a malleable concept otherwise it would have been been invaded nearly day 1. By the late 90s it's estimated over 15,000 Syrians died fighting against Türkiye for the PKK alone, something which maybe a lot more this timeline, decades of a cruel, corrupt dictatorships and a perception of being at constant war since 1948 alongside state emergencies have radicalised the population while simultaneously shutting down any form of non political expression that's not pro state or radicals who have a captive, despairing audience that the state sometimes uses.
See Abu al-Qaqa a famous Syrian cleric who celebrated the 9/11 attacks a few days after publicly and was arrested for a few hours before the Mukhabarat let him out, and later on went door to door in Aleppo recruiting boys for the Jihad in Iraq.
Currently Syria is feuding with Türkiye over water resources, Israel for a host of reasons, Iraq, various Lebanese parties ect and seeks to become the head of the Arab world, getting more entangled and giving them support we must at least accept the risk some of it's going to be used for something we don't want.
Population ranking (2003)
1. China - 1,288,000,000
2. India - 1,117,000,000
3. United States - 291,100,000
4. Indonesia - 223,080,000
5. Brazil - 182,630,000
6. Union State - 171,400,000
7. Pakistan - 166,900,000
8. Bangladesh - 136,500,000
9. Nigeria - 133,100,000
10. Japan - 127,500,000
11. Mexico - 102,430,000
12. Germany - 83,750,000
13. Philippines - 82,940,000
14. Vietnam - 81,480,000
15. Egypt - 75,960,000
16. Ethiopia - 73,170,000
17. Iran - 67,950,000
18. Turkey - 66,870,000
19. Thailand - 64,780,000
20. France - 59,730,000
21. United Kingdom - 59,650,000
22. Italy - 57,43,000
23. Congo - 53,210,000
24. South Africa - 48,100,000
25. S. Korea - 47,890,000
2. India - 1,117,000,000
3. United States - 291,100,000
4. Indonesia - 223,080,000
5. Brazil - 182,630,000
6. Union State - 171,400,000
7. Pakistan - 166,900,000
8. Bangladesh - 136,500,000
9. Nigeria - 133,100,000
10. Japan - 127,500,000
11. Mexico - 102,430,000
12. Germany - 83,750,000
13. Philippines - 82,940,000
14. Vietnam - 81,480,000
15. Egypt - 75,960,000
16. Ethiopia - 73,170,000
17. Iran - 67,950,000
18. Turkey - 66,870,000
19. Thailand - 64,780,000
20. France - 59,730,000
21. United Kingdom - 59,650,000
22. Italy - 57,43,000
23. Congo - 53,210,000
24. South Africa - 48,100,000
25. S. Korea - 47,890,000
Last edited:
Warriors of the Motherland: The Epoch of Tabletop Gaming in Russia (1980s-2003)
As the Soviet Union crumbled, a subtle revolution unfolded beneath the surface of political and social upheaval in Russia: the rise of tabletop gaming. Spanning from the 1980s to 2003, this narrative delves into the intricate journey of Russian enthusiasts who, inspired by Western classics like Dungeons & Dragons (D&D) and Warhammer, forged a unique identity in the world of tabletop gaming.
1. Pioneering Enthusiasts (1980s):
In the early 1980s, a handful of daring individuals, captivated by the allure of D&D and Warhammer, undertook the formidable task of translating and adapting these foreign wonders into the Russian language. This pioneering spirit, fueled by passion and a thirst for imagination, became the cornerstone of what would evolve into the Russian tabletop gaming community.
2. DIY Culture and Adaptations (1990s):
The turbulent 1990s, marked by economic uncertainty and shifting political landscapes, witnessed the birth of a vibrant DIY culture among Russian gamers. Faced with limited access to official gaming materials, the community thrived on creativity, producing homegrown adaptations that not only sustained their hobby but also gave birth to uniquely Russian game settings, blending fantasy with the tapestry of their own culture.
3. Rise of Russian Mythology (1995-2000):
In a bid to distinguish themselves globally, Russian game designers embarked on a quest to intertwine their creations with the rich tapestry of Russian history and folklore.
Games began featuring Slavic mythology, historical settings reminiscent of medieval Rus', and fantastical elements drawn from the works of Russian literary giants, weaving a narrative distinctly Russian in its essence.
4. Gaming Clubs and Conventions (Late 1990s):
The late 1990s witnessed the establishment of gaming clubs and conventions across the vast expanse of Russia. These gatherings were not merely spaces for gameplay but served as crucibles of creativity, where enthusiasts could showcase their homemade creations, exchange ideas, and foster a sense of camaraderie that fueled the growth of the Russian tabletop gaming scene.
5. Digital Age Integration (Early 2000s):
The dawn of the new millennium ushered in a new era for Russian tabletop gaming with the advent of the internet. Online forums, websites, and digital tools became integral to the community, transcending geographical distances and allowing for collaborative endeavors among gamers, artists, and writers.
6. Emergence of Professional Studios (2000-2003):
As the new millennium unfolded, a wave of professionalism swept through the Russian tabletop gaming landscape. Enthusiasts transformed into industry professionals, and dedicated studios emerged, producing high-quality rulebooks, miniatures, and accessories. This transformation marked a significant milestone in the maturation of the Russian tabletop gaming industry.
7. Diversification of Themes (Early 2000s):
Russian tabletop games evolved beyond traditional fantasy and historical settings, exploring a myriad of themes that echoed the complexity of Russian culture. Sci-fi, steampunk, and alternate history became popular genres, reflecting the depth and diversity of the Russian gaming imagination.
8. International Recognition (2003):
By 2003, Russian tabletop games had transcended their regional origins, gaining international acclaim. Translations of popular Russian games, coupled with collaborations with international designers, not only showcased Russia's place in the global tabletop gaming community but also contributed to the enrichment of the global gaming landscape.
9. Legacy of the Epoch:
The period up to 2003 left an indelible mark, solidifying the formative years of a vibrant and diverse Russian tabletop gaming scene. Russian games, with their unique blend of history, mythology, and innovation, continued to thrive, leaving an enduring impact on the world of tabletop gaming. The journey of these gamers, from pioneers to industry professionals, stands as a testament to the resilience, creativity, and shared passion that defined the epoch of tabletop gaming in Russia.
1. Pioneering Enthusiasts (1980s):
In the early 1980s, a handful of daring individuals, captivated by the allure of D&D and Warhammer, undertook the formidable task of translating and adapting these foreign wonders into the Russian language. This pioneering spirit, fueled by passion and a thirst for imagination, became the cornerstone of what would evolve into the Russian tabletop gaming community.
2. DIY Culture and Adaptations (1990s):
The turbulent 1990s, marked by economic uncertainty and shifting political landscapes, witnessed the birth of a vibrant DIY culture among Russian gamers. Faced with limited access to official gaming materials, the community thrived on creativity, producing homegrown adaptations that not only sustained their hobby but also gave birth to uniquely Russian game settings, blending fantasy with the tapestry of their own culture.
3. Rise of Russian Mythology (1995-2000):
In a bid to distinguish themselves globally, Russian game designers embarked on a quest to intertwine their creations with the rich tapestry of Russian history and folklore.
Games began featuring Slavic mythology, historical settings reminiscent of medieval Rus', and fantastical elements drawn from the works of Russian literary giants, weaving a narrative distinctly Russian in its essence.
4. Gaming Clubs and Conventions (Late 1990s):
The late 1990s witnessed the establishment of gaming clubs and conventions across the vast expanse of Russia. These gatherings were not merely spaces for gameplay but served as crucibles of creativity, where enthusiasts could showcase their homemade creations, exchange ideas, and foster a sense of camaraderie that fueled the growth of the Russian tabletop gaming scene.
5. Digital Age Integration (Early 2000s):
The dawn of the new millennium ushered in a new era for Russian tabletop gaming with the advent of the internet. Online forums, websites, and digital tools became integral to the community, transcending geographical distances and allowing for collaborative endeavors among gamers, artists, and writers.
6. Emergence of Professional Studios (2000-2003):
As the new millennium unfolded, a wave of professionalism swept through the Russian tabletop gaming landscape. Enthusiasts transformed into industry professionals, and dedicated studios emerged, producing high-quality rulebooks, miniatures, and accessories. This transformation marked a significant milestone in the maturation of the Russian tabletop gaming industry.
7. Diversification of Themes (Early 2000s):
Russian tabletop games evolved beyond traditional fantasy and historical settings, exploring a myriad of themes that echoed the complexity of Russian culture. Sci-fi, steampunk, and alternate history became popular genres, reflecting the depth and diversity of the Russian gaming imagination.
8. International Recognition (2003):
By 2003, Russian tabletop games had transcended their regional origins, gaining international acclaim. Translations of popular Russian games, coupled with collaborations with international designers, not only showcased Russia's place in the global tabletop gaming community but also contributed to the enrichment of the global gaming landscape.
9. Legacy of the Epoch:
The period up to 2003 left an indelible mark, solidifying the formative years of a vibrant and diverse Russian tabletop gaming scene. Russian games, with their unique blend of history, mythology, and innovation, continued to thrive, leaving an enduring impact on the world of tabletop gaming. The journey of these gamers, from pioneers to industry professionals, stands as a testament to the resilience, creativity, and shared passion that defined the epoch of tabletop gaming in Russia.
China's Military Renaissance: A Comprehensive Modernization Drive in the Early 21st Century
In the early 21st century, China embarked on a rapid and comprehensive modernization of its armed forces, transforming the People's Liberation Army (PLA) into a formidable and technologically advanced military entity. This ambitious initiative encompassed various branches of the armed forces and was driven by strategic imperatives to address evolving security challenges and assert China's influence on the global stage.
People's Liberation Army (PLA):
China's commitment to modernizing its ground forces was evident in a substantial upgrade of equipment and capabilities. The PLA underwent a transformation, with a focus on acquiring modern tanks, artillery, and infantry equipment. The goal was to create a more agile and technologically advanced land force capable of rapid deployment and joint operations. Concurrently, training programs were revamped to enhance the skills of PLA personnel, ensuring they were well-prepared for the complexities of modern warfare.
Chinese Navy:
Recognizing the importance of safeguarding maritime interests, China significantly expanded and modernized its naval capabilities. The acquisition of advanced warships, including destroyers and frigates, coupled with the development of a robust submarine force, aimed to provide China with both regional and global naval prowess. The construction of aircraft carriers marked a strategic leap, allowing China to project power beyond its immediate waters and assert its presence in contested regions like the South China Sea.
Chinese Air Force:
China's modernization efforts extended to the air force, focusing on achieving air superiority and enhancing power projection capabilities. The acquisition of advanced fighter jets, strategic bombers, air-to-air refueling capabilities, and airborne early warning systems strengthened China's ability to operate both regionally and globally. Training programs were overhauled to ensure pilots were proficient in operating cutting-edge aircraft and employing modern aerial tactics.
Strategic Missile Forces:
China prioritized the modernization of its strategic missile forces, emphasizing the development of advanced intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBMs). This effort aimed to enhance China's nuclear deterrent capabilities, ensuring a credible and effective response to potential threats. The modernization of the strategic missile forces reinforced China's position in global security discussions.
Technological Innovation:
Integral to China's modernization drive was a focus on technological innovation. Investments in cyber capabilities, electronic warfare systems, and space-based assets demonstrated China's commitment to disrupting adversary communications. The development of anti-satellite (ASAT) capabilities and the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) showcased China's dedication to staying at the forefront of military technology.
Training and Doctrine:
China recognized that modernization extended beyond hardware; it required a shift in training and strategic doctrines. The PLA underwent significant reforms to create a more adaptable and flexible military force capable of responding to diverse threats. Joint exercises were conducted to enhance coordination between different branches of the military. Reforms in military education and the development of innovative doctrines reflected China's commitment to preparing its armed forces for the complexities of 21st-century warfare.
China's rapid modernization of its armed forces by 2003 not only bolstered its regional influence but also positioned it as a global military player. The multifaceted approach addressed various aspects, from personnel training to technological innovation, shaping China into a formidable force in the international security landscape.
People's Liberation Army (PLA):
China's commitment to modernizing its ground forces was evident in a substantial upgrade of equipment and capabilities. The PLA underwent a transformation, with a focus on acquiring modern tanks, artillery, and infantry equipment. The goal was to create a more agile and technologically advanced land force capable of rapid deployment and joint operations. Concurrently, training programs were revamped to enhance the skills of PLA personnel, ensuring they were well-prepared for the complexities of modern warfare.
Chinese Navy:
Recognizing the importance of safeguarding maritime interests, China significantly expanded and modernized its naval capabilities. The acquisition of advanced warships, including destroyers and frigates, coupled with the development of a robust submarine force, aimed to provide China with both regional and global naval prowess. The construction of aircraft carriers marked a strategic leap, allowing China to project power beyond its immediate waters and assert its presence in contested regions like the South China Sea.
Chinese Air Force:
China's modernization efforts extended to the air force, focusing on achieving air superiority and enhancing power projection capabilities. The acquisition of advanced fighter jets, strategic bombers, air-to-air refueling capabilities, and airborne early warning systems strengthened China's ability to operate both regionally and globally. Training programs were overhauled to ensure pilots were proficient in operating cutting-edge aircraft and employing modern aerial tactics.
Strategic Missile Forces:
China prioritized the modernization of its strategic missile forces, emphasizing the development of advanced intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBMs). This effort aimed to enhance China's nuclear deterrent capabilities, ensuring a credible and effective response to potential threats. The modernization of the strategic missile forces reinforced China's position in global security discussions.
Technological Innovation:
Integral to China's modernization drive was a focus on technological innovation. Investments in cyber capabilities, electronic warfare systems, and space-based assets demonstrated China's commitment to disrupting adversary communications. The development of anti-satellite (ASAT) capabilities and the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) showcased China's dedication to staying at the forefront of military technology.
Training and Doctrine:
China recognized that modernization extended beyond hardware; it required a shift in training and strategic doctrines. The PLA underwent significant reforms to create a more adaptable and flexible military force capable of responding to diverse threats. Joint exercises were conducted to enhance coordination between different branches of the military. Reforms in military education and the development of innovative doctrines reflected China's commitment to preparing its armed forces for the complexities of 21st-century warfare.
China's rapid modernization of its armed forces by 2003 not only bolstered its regional influence but also positioned it as a global military player. The multifaceted approach addressed various aspects, from personnel training to technological innovation, shaping China into a formidable force in the international security landscape.
Gazprom's Ascendance: A Comprehensive Chronicle of Expansion and Modernization Till 2003
In the tapestry of Russia's energy landscape, Gazprom stands as a colossal figure, its journey marked by strategic expansion, technological prowess, and diversification into various sectors. By 2003, Gazprom's influence extended far beyond the confines of the energy sector, permeating media, business ventures, and even sports.
Strategic Domestic Expansion: Gazprom's dominance in the domestic energy market reached new heights as the company strategically expanded its operations within Russia. With an unyielding focus on harnessing the country's extensive natural gas reserves, Gazprom secured its position as the primary supplier of natural gas to the Russian populace. This strategic domestic expansion not only fueled Russia's economic growth but also solidified Gazprom's role as a linchpin in the nation's energy security.
International Collaborations and Energy Diplomacy: On the international stage, Gazprom engaged in strategic collaborations that transcended traditional energy partnerships. The company entered into agreements with European energy giants, forging alliances that underpinned its role as a reliable supplier of natural gas to key regions. These collaborations also played a pivotal role in diplomatic efforts, turning Gazprom into a central player in discussions on global energy security and cooperation.
Technological Advancements and Modernization Drive: Gazprom's commitment to technological advancements served as a cornerstone for its modernization initiatives. The company invested extensively in cutting-edge technologies, enhancing efficiency across its operations. From extraction methods to processing techniques, Gazprom's technological prowess not only elevated its standing within the energy sector but also positioned it as a leader in innovation on the global stage.
Infrastructure Development and Global Reach: Recognizing the importance of robust infrastructure, Gazprom embarked on an ambitious development drive. The company invested significantly in building an extensive network of pipelines and transportation systems, facilitating the seamless movement of natural gas across vast distances. This infrastructure backbone not only ensured a reliable energy supply within Russia but also strengthened Gazprom's ability to fulfill international commitments.
Diversification Beyond Energy: Gazprom's ambition extended beyond energy, venturing into diverse sectors. The company expanded its operations into media, wielding influence through ownership stakes in major outlets. Additionally, Gazprom diversified its business ventures, engaging in a spectrum of industries that ranged from telecommunications to real estate. This strategic diversification not only enhanced Gazprom's economic portfolio but also solidified its standing as a multifaceted conglomerate.
Sports Ventures and Cultural Impact: Gazprom's influence extended to the realm of sports, where the company engaged in strategic sponsorships and ownership stakes. Through partnerships with major sports teams and events, Gazprom not only bolstered its brand visibility but also contributed to the cultural fabric of Russia. The company's foray into sports underscored its commitment to playing a multifaceted role in shaping the nation's identity.
In conclusion, the expansion and modernization of Gazprom till 2003 reflect a multifaceted journey. From strategic domestic expansion to international collaborations, technological innovations, and diversification into various sectors, Gazprom emerged as a powerhouse shaping Russia's economic landscape and cultural identity on the global stage.
Strategic Domestic Expansion: Gazprom's dominance in the domestic energy market reached new heights as the company strategically expanded its operations within Russia. With an unyielding focus on harnessing the country's extensive natural gas reserves, Gazprom secured its position as the primary supplier of natural gas to the Russian populace. This strategic domestic expansion not only fueled Russia's economic growth but also solidified Gazprom's role as a linchpin in the nation's energy security.
International Collaborations and Energy Diplomacy: On the international stage, Gazprom engaged in strategic collaborations that transcended traditional energy partnerships. The company entered into agreements with European energy giants, forging alliances that underpinned its role as a reliable supplier of natural gas to key regions. These collaborations also played a pivotal role in diplomatic efforts, turning Gazprom into a central player in discussions on global energy security and cooperation.
Technological Advancements and Modernization Drive: Gazprom's commitment to technological advancements served as a cornerstone for its modernization initiatives. The company invested extensively in cutting-edge technologies, enhancing efficiency across its operations. From extraction methods to processing techniques, Gazprom's technological prowess not only elevated its standing within the energy sector but also positioned it as a leader in innovation on the global stage.
Infrastructure Development and Global Reach: Recognizing the importance of robust infrastructure, Gazprom embarked on an ambitious development drive. The company invested significantly in building an extensive network of pipelines and transportation systems, facilitating the seamless movement of natural gas across vast distances. This infrastructure backbone not only ensured a reliable energy supply within Russia but also strengthened Gazprom's ability to fulfill international commitments.
Diversification Beyond Energy: Gazprom's ambition extended beyond energy, venturing into diverse sectors. The company expanded its operations into media, wielding influence through ownership stakes in major outlets. Additionally, Gazprom diversified its business ventures, engaging in a spectrum of industries that ranged from telecommunications to real estate. This strategic diversification not only enhanced Gazprom's economic portfolio but also solidified its standing as a multifaceted conglomerate.
Sports Ventures and Cultural Impact: Gazprom's influence extended to the realm of sports, where the company engaged in strategic sponsorships and ownership stakes. Through partnerships with major sports teams and events, Gazprom not only bolstered its brand visibility but also contributed to the cultural fabric of Russia. The company's foray into sports underscored its commitment to playing a multifaceted role in shaping the nation's identity.
In conclusion, the expansion and modernization of Gazprom till 2003 reflect a multifaceted journey. From strategic domestic expansion to international collaborations, technological innovations, and diversification into various sectors, Gazprom emerged as a powerhouse shaping Russia's economic landscape and cultural identity on the global stage.
Gazprom's Diversification Odyssey: Expanding Horizons Beyond Energy
Gazprom's journey into diversification marked a strategic evolution, transforming the energy giant into a multifaceted conglomerate with a presence in diverse sectors. By 2003, Gazprom had strategically ventured beyond its traditional energy domain, leveraging its economic might to wield influence across a spectrum of industries.
1. Media Dominance:
Gazprom's foray into the media landscape was a strategic move to extend its influence over public discourse. The company secured ownership stakes in major media outlets, ranging from television channels to newspapers. This media dominance not only provided Gazprom with a powerful platform to shape narratives but also amplified its voice in the public sphere. The symbiotic relationship between energy and media influence solidified Gazprom's role in shaping Russia's informational landscape.
2. Telecommunications Ventures:
Recognizing the pivotal role of telecommunications in the modern era, Gazprom diversified into this sector. The company invested in the development of telecommunication infrastructure, including the expansion of broadband services and the establishment of communication networks. This diversification aligned with Gazprom's overarching strategy of becoming a comprehensive player in Russia's technological landscape.
3. Real Estate Ventures:
Gazprom's economic clout extended into the realm of real estate, where the company engaged in strategic investments and developments. These ventures included the construction of commercial and residential properties, contributing to urban development initiatives. The real estate diversification not only served as an avenue for investment but also positioned Gazprom as a key player in shaping the physical landscape of Russian cities.
4. Technological Innovation Hubs:
Gazprom directed substantial investments toward fostering technological innovation. The company established research and development hubs focused on cutting-edge technologies. These hubs became epicenters for technological advancements, enhancing Gazprom's operational efficiency while contributing to Russia's broader technological landscape.
5. Cultural and Educational Initiatives:
Gazprom's diversification efforts extended to cultural and educational spheres. The company invested in initiatives that supported the arts, cultural events, and educational programs. This cultural patronage not only bolstered Gazprom's public image but also positioned the company as a responsible corporate citizen contributing to the enrichment of Russian society.
6. Venture Capital and Start-up Ecosystem:
Gazprom strategically entered the venture capital arena, investing in promising start-ups and innovative enterprises. By fostering a supportive ecosystem for entrepreneurship, Gazprom contributed to the growth of the Russian start-up landscape. This diversification into venture capital aligned with broader efforts to stimulate economic dynamism and technological ingenuity.
In essence, Gazprom's diversification beyond energy by 2003 showcased a well-calibrated strategy. The company, armed with financial prowess and a forward-looking vision, strategically entered sectors that complemented its core strengths. From media dominance to telecommunications, real estate, technological innovation, cultural initiatives, and venture capital, Gazprom's diversification represented a holistic approach to shaping Russia's economic and societal landscape.
1. Media Dominance:
Gazprom's foray into the media landscape was a strategic move to extend its influence over public discourse. The company secured ownership stakes in major media outlets, ranging from television channels to newspapers. This media dominance not only provided Gazprom with a powerful platform to shape narratives but also amplified its voice in the public sphere. The symbiotic relationship between energy and media influence solidified Gazprom's role in shaping Russia's informational landscape.
2. Telecommunications Ventures:
Recognizing the pivotal role of telecommunications in the modern era, Gazprom diversified into this sector. The company invested in the development of telecommunication infrastructure, including the expansion of broadband services and the establishment of communication networks. This diversification aligned with Gazprom's overarching strategy of becoming a comprehensive player in Russia's technological landscape.
3. Real Estate Ventures:
Gazprom's economic clout extended into the realm of real estate, where the company engaged in strategic investments and developments. These ventures included the construction of commercial and residential properties, contributing to urban development initiatives. The real estate diversification not only served as an avenue for investment but also positioned Gazprom as a key player in shaping the physical landscape of Russian cities.
4. Technological Innovation Hubs:
Gazprom directed substantial investments toward fostering technological innovation. The company established research and development hubs focused on cutting-edge technologies. These hubs became epicenters for technological advancements, enhancing Gazprom's operational efficiency while contributing to Russia's broader technological landscape.
5. Cultural and Educational Initiatives:
Gazprom's diversification efforts extended to cultural and educational spheres. The company invested in initiatives that supported the arts, cultural events, and educational programs. This cultural patronage not only bolstered Gazprom's public image but also positioned the company as a responsible corporate citizen contributing to the enrichment of Russian society.
6. Venture Capital and Start-up Ecosystem:
Gazprom strategically entered the venture capital arena, investing in promising start-ups and innovative enterprises. By fostering a supportive ecosystem for entrepreneurship, Gazprom contributed to the growth of the Russian start-up landscape. This diversification into venture capital aligned with broader efforts to stimulate economic dynamism and technological ingenuity.
In essence, Gazprom's diversification beyond energy by 2003 showcased a well-calibrated strategy. The company, armed with financial prowess and a forward-looking vision, strategically entered sectors that complemented its core strengths. From media dominance to telecommunications, real estate, technological innovation, cultural initiatives, and venture capital, Gazprom's diversification represented a holistic approach to shaping Russia's economic and societal landscape.
Resurgent Russia: Echoes in the East and Northern Europe
As Russia's resurgence unfolds, the former Eastern Bloc and Northern European nations are delicately navigating historical echoes and emerging challenges. Each country, shaped by its unique history, finds itself at the crossroads of geopolitics, responding with nuanced strategies to the evolving regional landscape.
1. Warsaw's Watchful Eye (Poland):
Poland, a pivotal player etched in the Cold War struggle, stands resolute in the face of resurgent Russia, emerging as the primary competitor for Russian influence in Eastern and Central Europe. Warsaw's geopolitical significance is underscored by its unwavering commitment to strengthening ties within NATO, acting as a linchpin to fortify regional security. Poland, recognizing the evolving threat landscape, has implemented robust measures to enhance its defense capabilities. A significant increase in defense spending reflects Poland's dedication to modernizing its armed forces, ensuring they remain at the cutting edge of technology and strategy. This strategic investment not only safeguards Poland's national interests but positions the nation as a key contributor to NATO's collective defense efforts. Actively participating in joint exercises has become a cornerstone of Poland's approach. By fostering interoperability with NATO forces, Poland not only hones its military capabilities but also strengthens the alliance's overall readiness. These exercises serve as a testament to Warsaw's proactive stance, sending a clear message of solidarity and readiness to respond collectively to any potential threats in the region.
Poland's strategic location, at the crossroads of Eastern and Central Europe, amplifies its significance within NATO's eastern flank. Warsaw's historical context, marked by the struggles of the Cold War era, further fuels its commitment to preserving sovereignty, stability, and a resilient Eastern European community. As a key actor, Poland plays a crucial role in shaping NATO's posture against potential threats, positioning itself as a staunch defender of democratic values and regional security. In this complex geopolitical landscape, Poland's watchful eye extends beyond its borders, seeking to counterbalance Russian influence in the region. The nation's proactive and competitive approach solidifies its position as a central player in Eastern and Central Europe, contributing significantly to the collective efforts of NATO and reinforcing the alliance's commitment to a united and secure Europe.
2. Prague's Pragmatism (Czech Republic):
The Czech Republic, guided by pragmatism, treads a diplomatic path that balances historical ties and contemporary realities. Prague places importance on constructive dialogue with Moscow while actively participating in European Union initiatives. Czech leaders emphasize economic partnerships, seeking to strengthen trade ties and regional cooperation. As a committed member of NATO, Prague contributes to collective defense efforts, ensuring a robust response to potential challenges. The Czech Republic's pragmatism manifests in a delicate balance that upholds European values while engaging in diplomatic discourse with resurgent Russia.
3. Budapest's Balancing Act (Hungary):
Hungary, caught between historical connections and European affiliations, performs a nuanced balancing act. Budapest focuses on economic cooperation with Russia while maintaining a commitment to European integration. Hungary strategically engages in energy partnerships to ensure stability in the region. The Hungarian government actively participates in regional security initiatives, contributing to the collective defense efforts within NATO. Budapest's approach underscores a diplomatic balancing act that seeks to harness economic opportunities while safeguarding regional stability.
4. Bratislava's Strategic Calculations (Slovakia):
Slovakia, having forged its identity post-Czechoslovakia, recalibrates its foreign policy with strategic calculations. Bratislava aligns with evolving geopolitical realities, emphasizing strong ties with both Western and Eastern partners. Slovakia focuses on economic collaboration, energy security, and regional stability. Within NATO, Slovakia contributes to joint defense efforts, ensuring a proactive stance against potential threats. The Slovak government's strategic calculations prioritize national interests while navigating the complexities of the international landscape.
5. Zagreb's Geopolitical Landscape (Croatia):
Croatia, perched on the Adriatic, assesses the implications of Russia's resurgence. Zagreb reaffirms its commitment to European integration, actively participating in EU initiatives. Croatia strategically engages in economic collaboration, emphasizing stability in the region. The Croatian government contributes to regional security, aligning itself with NATO's collective defense efforts. Croatia's geopolitical landscape involves fostering diplomatic ties, economic resilience, and regional stability in the face of changing geopolitical dynamics.
6. Vilnius' Baltic Resilience (Lithuania):
Lithuania, resilient in the Baltic region, adopts a robust stance against potential challenges. Vilnius strengthens efforts within NATO, emphasizing the importance of collective defense and regional security. Lithuania actively contributes to regional initiatives, fostering a united Baltic front against external pressures. The Lithuanian government focuses on strengthening military capabilities, participating in joint exercises, and ensuring a cohesive response to evolving security challenges. Vilnius's Baltic resilience underscores a commitment to democratic values and a proactive defense posture.
7. Riga's Baltic Solidarity (Latvia):
Latvia, nestled on the Baltic Sea, reinforces solidarity within the Baltic states. Riga advocates for a united front within NATO and the European Union, emphasizing a coordinated response to challenges posed by Russia's resurgence. Latvia actively participates in regional security initiatives, contributing to joint defense efforts. The Latvian government's unwavering commitment to democratic values and regional stability shapes its role in the evolving geopolitical landscape. Riga's Baltic solidarity manifests in a collective approach that upholds shared values and ensures a resilient response to external pressures.
8. Ankara's Strategic Realignment (Turkey):
Turkey, with a rich historical and geopolitical significance, strategically realigns its foreign policy in response to Russia's resurgence. Anchored between Europe and the Middle East, Ankara diversifies its partnerships to navigate complex regional dynamics. While maintaining its NATO membership and Western ties, Turkey seeks avenues for collaboration with Russia, particularly in energy and defense. Ankara's calibrated approach involves balancing its Western commitments with pragmatic engagements in the changing geopolitical landscape.
10. Helsinki's Prudent Neutrality (Finland):
Finland, historically practicing a policy of military non-alignment, adopts a prudent stance in response to Russia's resurgence. Helsinki emphasizes maintaining a neutral and pragmatic position, refraining from formal alignment with military blocs. Finland continues to actively engage in regional cooperation within the European Union, prioritizing diplomatic dialogue as a means to address security concerns. Helsinki's approach aims to safeguard national interests while navigating the evolving security environment.
11. Stockholm's Non-Aligned Diplomacy (Sweden):
Sweden, upholding its longstanding policy of military non-alignment, strategically navigates the challenges posed by Russia's resurgence through diplomatic means. Stockholm places a high priority on active participation in regional and international organizations, fostering collaborations based on democratic values. While avoiding formal alignment with military alliances, Sweden focuses on enhancing its defense capabilities and contributing to collective security efforts. Stockholm's non-aligned diplomacy aims to promote regional stability and security through proactive diplomatic engagement.
As these nations traverse the intricate path of international relations, their responses to Russia's resurgence paint a nuanced picture. Through vigilant defense postures, pragmatic diplomacy, and strategic balancing acts, these Eastern and Northern European nations collectively contribute to shaping the regional response to the evolving geopolitical landscape, where history and the present converge.
1. Warsaw's Watchful Eye (Poland):
Poland, a pivotal player etched in the Cold War struggle, stands resolute in the face of resurgent Russia, emerging as the primary competitor for Russian influence in Eastern and Central Europe. Warsaw's geopolitical significance is underscored by its unwavering commitment to strengthening ties within NATO, acting as a linchpin to fortify regional security. Poland, recognizing the evolving threat landscape, has implemented robust measures to enhance its defense capabilities. A significant increase in defense spending reflects Poland's dedication to modernizing its armed forces, ensuring they remain at the cutting edge of technology and strategy. This strategic investment not only safeguards Poland's national interests but positions the nation as a key contributor to NATO's collective defense efforts. Actively participating in joint exercises has become a cornerstone of Poland's approach. By fostering interoperability with NATO forces, Poland not only hones its military capabilities but also strengthens the alliance's overall readiness. These exercises serve as a testament to Warsaw's proactive stance, sending a clear message of solidarity and readiness to respond collectively to any potential threats in the region.
Poland's strategic location, at the crossroads of Eastern and Central Europe, amplifies its significance within NATO's eastern flank. Warsaw's historical context, marked by the struggles of the Cold War era, further fuels its commitment to preserving sovereignty, stability, and a resilient Eastern European community. As a key actor, Poland plays a crucial role in shaping NATO's posture against potential threats, positioning itself as a staunch defender of democratic values and regional security. In this complex geopolitical landscape, Poland's watchful eye extends beyond its borders, seeking to counterbalance Russian influence in the region. The nation's proactive and competitive approach solidifies its position as a central player in Eastern and Central Europe, contributing significantly to the collective efforts of NATO and reinforcing the alliance's commitment to a united and secure Europe.
2. Prague's Pragmatism (Czech Republic):
The Czech Republic, guided by pragmatism, treads a diplomatic path that balances historical ties and contemporary realities. Prague places importance on constructive dialogue with Moscow while actively participating in European Union initiatives. Czech leaders emphasize economic partnerships, seeking to strengthen trade ties and regional cooperation. As a committed member of NATO, Prague contributes to collective defense efforts, ensuring a robust response to potential challenges. The Czech Republic's pragmatism manifests in a delicate balance that upholds European values while engaging in diplomatic discourse with resurgent Russia.
3. Budapest's Balancing Act (Hungary):
Hungary, caught between historical connections and European affiliations, performs a nuanced balancing act. Budapest focuses on economic cooperation with Russia while maintaining a commitment to European integration. Hungary strategically engages in energy partnerships to ensure stability in the region. The Hungarian government actively participates in regional security initiatives, contributing to the collective defense efforts within NATO. Budapest's approach underscores a diplomatic balancing act that seeks to harness economic opportunities while safeguarding regional stability.
4. Bratislava's Strategic Calculations (Slovakia):
Slovakia, having forged its identity post-Czechoslovakia, recalibrates its foreign policy with strategic calculations. Bratislava aligns with evolving geopolitical realities, emphasizing strong ties with both Western and Eastern partners. Slovakia focuses on economic collaboration, energy security, and regional stability. Within NATO, Slovakia contributes to joint defense efforts, ensuring a proactive stance against potential threats. The Slovak government's strategic calculations prioritize national interests while navigating the complexities of the international landscape.
5. Zagreb's Geopolitical Landscape (Croatia):
Croatia, perched on the Adriatic, assesses the implications of Russia's resurgence. Zagreb reaffirms its commitment to European integration, actively participating in EU initiatives. Croatia strategically engages in economic collaboration, emphasizing stability in the region. The Croatian government contributes to regional security, aligning itself with NATO's collective defense efforts. Croatia's geopolitical landscape involves fostering diplomatic ties, economic resilience, and regional stability in the face of changing geopolitical dynamics.
6. Vilnius' Baltic Resilience (Lithuania):
Lithuania, resilient in the Baltic region, adopts a robust stance against potential challenges. Vilnius strengthens efforts within NATO, emphasizing the importance of collective defense and regional security. Lithuania actively contributes to regional initiatives, fostering a united Baltic front against external pressures. The Lithuanian government focuses on strengthening military capabilities, participating in joint exercises, and ensuring a cohesive response to evolving security challenges. Vilnius's Baltic resilience underscores a commitment to democratic values and a proactive defense posture.
7. Riga's Baltic Solidarity (Latvia):
Latvia, nestled on the Baltic Sea, reinforces solidarity within the Baltic states. Riga advocates for a united front within NATO and the European Union, emphasizing a coordinated response to challenges posed by Russia's resurgence. Latvia actively participates in regional security initiatives, contributing to joint defense efforts. The Latvian government's unwavering commitment to democratic values and regional stability shapes its role in the evolving geopolitical landscape. Riga's Baltic solidarity manifests in a collective approach that upholds shared values and ensures a resilient response to external pressures.
8. Ankara's Strategic Realignment (Turkey):
Turkey, with a rich historical and geopolitical significance, strategically realigns its foreign policy in response to Russia's resurgence. Anchored between Europe and the Middle East, Ankara diversifies its partnerships to navigate complex regional dynamics. While maintaining its NATO membership and Western ties, Turkey seeks avenues for collaboration with Russia, particularly in energy and defense. Ankara's calibrated approach involves balancing its Western commitments with pragmatic engagements in the changing geopolitical landscape.
10. Helsinki's Prudent Neutrality (Finland):
Finland, historically practicing a policy of military non-alignment, adopts a prudent stance in response to Russia's resurgence. Helsinki emphasizes maintaining a neutral and pragmatic position, refraining from formal alignment with military blocs. Finland continues to actively engage in regional cooperation within the European Union, prioritizing diplomatic dialogue as a means to address security concerns. Helsinki's approach aims to safeguard national interests while navigating the evolving security environment.
11. Stockholm's Non-Aligned Diplomacy (Sweden):
Sweden, upholding its longstanding policy of military non-alignment, strategically navigates the challenges posed by Russia's resurgence through diplomatic means. Stockholm places a high priority on active participation in regional and international organizations, fostering collaborations based on democratic values. While avoiding formal alignment with military alliances, Sweden focuses on enhancing its defense capabilities and contributing to collective security efforts. Stockholm's non-aligned diplomacy aims to promote regional stability and security through proactive diplomatic engagement.
As these nations traverse the intricate path of international relations, their responses to Russia's resurgence paint a nuanced picture. Through vigilant defense postures, pragmatic diplomacy, and strategic balancing acts, these Eastern and Northern European nations collectively contribute to shaping the regional response to the evolving geopolitical landscape, where history and the present converge.
Last edited:
Defence budget ranking (2003)
1. United States - $500,000,000,000
2. China - $60,000,000,000
2. Russia - $60,000,000,000
4. United Kingdom - $51,000,000,000
5. Japan - $47,000,000,000
6. France - $42,000,000,000
7. Germany - $36,000,000,000
8. Italy - $29,000,000,000
9. Saudi Arabia - $20,000,000,000
10. India - $18,000,000,000
2. China - $60,000,000,000
2. Russia - $60,000,000,000
4. United Kingdom - $51,000,000,000
5. Japan - $47,000,000,000
6. France - $42,000,000,000
7. Germany - $36,000,000,000
8. Italy - $29,000,000,000
9. Saudi Arabia - $20,000,000,000
10. India - $18,000,000,000
Last edited:
These numbers are way too high buddy. For the Union state for instance, that means almost one quarter of the Federal Budget even with Belarus + Russia and better growth then OTL China. You wouldn't be able to invest in anything, you'd barely afford healthcare and education. If that. And the British number was OTL 52.3 billion, so 150% of OTL is too much. The US budget was 440, so that's a lot more too.
Sure I can see the US and maybe the British and some others spend more then OTL with a scary Union State. But that much? Plus there is no way the Union state can achieve 100 billion that early. Give it 5 more years. Then it works, which would put us in p2 world wide.
See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_past_military_expenditure
Last edited:
I'd say the GDP numbers of the Belarusian + Russian Union State are at best:
ibb.co
Code:
Year GDP Federal Budget Military Budget 2% GDP or 50B
2000 $1.092,693 $262,246 $50,000
2001 $1.252,270 $300,545 $50,000
2002 $1.499,844 $359,963 $50,000
2003 $1.793,313 $430,395 $50,000
2004 $2.200,389 $528,093 $50,000
2005 $2.917,583 $700,220 $58,352
2006 $3.856,469 $925,553 $77,129
2007 $4.339,335 $1.041,440 $86,787
2008 $5.241,668 $1.258,000 $104,833
2009 $6.660,613 $1.598,547 $133,212
2010 $7.703,466 $1.848,832 $154,069Screenshot-20240206-032729-Sheets hosted at ImgBB
Image Screenshot-20240206-032729-Sheets hosted in ImgBB
ibb.co
Last edited:
Much better TY. I like your number for China, regardless whether they stepped up their spending or what is more likely, you actually acknowledge their real spending. China IMHO is like OTL Russia underreporting their military spend.
Britain seems a tad high with 130% of OTL still. So while your second set of numbers work, how about 110% compared to OTL?
1. United States - $480,000,000,000
2. China - $60,000,000,000
3. United Kingdom - $51,000,000,000
4. Russia - $50,000,000,000
5. Japan - $47,000,000,000
6. France - $42,000,000,000
7. Germany - $36,000,000,000
8. Italy - $29,000,000,000
9. Saudi Arabia - $20,000,000,000
10. India - $18,000,000,000
Increase the union state spending to 65 Billion,then the list is perfect. IMHO 65 Billion is reasonable,it is around 3.5% of our GDP.